Skip to main content

Berenice

Now this is probably going to sound like a contradiction and that's all right by me but this early Congress Berenice nude is absolute art whereas I've called other so-called pin-up girl playing cards raw smut.

First, there is no sexual connotation involved with the Berenice card. How could there be when a lion is swimming up from the abyss to meet her in magnanimity?! Even the secondary nude behind her sweeping arm is bathed in modesty. 

If one had to define the difference they'd start with intent. This card isn't meant to titillate. It's more of a voyeuristic view in the sense that one would not normally see a woman in her naked form unless he was intimate with her, though not explicitly in a sexual way. This card is artistic because it represents beauty in its natural element.

Then there's the peep-hole sort of voyeurism as shown in the deck above. Though, this is somewhat a bad example because the card backs are actually artistic even if the woman at front and center is getting plump with the available fruit. Yeah, it's tacky but were she not fondling herself it would be artistic, no? In fact, if they could reinvent the pack with the clover-hole window and this cartoon woman just standing there minding her own business we'd have art. But they didn't. The medium devolved into full-on smut as shown below.

Alas- we arrive at smut. I'm sure there are worse examples but the depiction above is in the vein of what set me off last week about the entire matter. On a Joker card to boot! You shameless penny-grubbers! Listen, if this woman was standing by my god-awful white wicker chair looking this way I'd probably moderate my tone but having seen Munch's Model by the Wicker Chair I have better discernment than that and can spot smut and reject it. For the same reason that you'd much rather have a secretary beau than an Only Fans wife I'd much rather have Berenice than the Joker's wild white honey mistress flamingo-ing herself on the ancient tableaus of wisdom and folly. The eBay seller's black censor swaths are the only thing containing artistic merit on the card.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Card Within a Card: 3 Jokers and Theirs

As ruminated upon in a previous post here are three more Jokers who are depicted wielding other cards within their own. The first one is openly presenting the Ace of Spades while concealing three others with a mere Diamond peeking out over one corner of the trumvirate. On the second Joker, from a Scandinavian deck, The King of Diamonds is figured prominently as the Joker leans upon it. His poppet Joker is also holding an Ace of Hearts. What it all means would depend on the manufacturer and artist, I suppose. The last specimen from Longfield Games features an Ace of Spades as the Joker stands upon a depiction of the world as a globe which seems almost 3/4 there but not quite whole. All interpretations of this and the preceding ones would be mere speculation and without knowing the artist and his source inspiration it would mainly be a stab into the void. Which is basically what this entire blog consists of.

Tart Rhymes

I came across this excellent booklet from The U. S. Playing Card Co. on Instagram and then tracked down its source to eBay where I took advantage of the generous photos on the listing and saved them in e-book form because it's the right thing to do for posterity's sake. The booklets contains a very short sequence of rhymes that make for one bizarre folktale that wouldn't cut it in today's cancel culture. Also displayed in the small booklet are some card packs produced by the company which is very helpful towards dating the cards for novices who don't have access to the company's historical records.

Blob-a-Dob-Will-Do-Ya